35mm · Film photography · Photography

An upgrade to my scanning system – Part 2 the chosen solution revealed!

Following yesterday’s mini-history of my 35mm film scanning journey to date, it’s time to reveal what I’ve chosen as my upgrade, which is…

The Valoi Easy 35 v2.

After taking the decision to try the DSLR scanning route, there were a number of options to choose from, but perhaps the biggest choice was between a copy-stand system, or something more all-in-one. I’ve seen may people use copy stands but they always presented me with a number of problems to overcome. The most obvious being that I don’t have a copy stand. The second that, even if I got one, I don’t really have anywhere to keep it. Added to that are a number of other issues that I believe copy-stand scanning presents, including the setup and configuration to ensure everything is perfectly level and free from vibration, the risk of stray light being reflected on the negative, and dust. Sure, there are systems that solve some of these issues, but they feel like workarounds and I suspect they would become a chore.

FILM - Bonnet

There are a few all-in-one systems I’ve seen, but the Valoi Easy 35 immediately caught my attention when I first saw it, particularly in Kyle McDougall’s YouTube review, which I’ll share below. It seemed like a simple, but robust, option that was both easy to setup, use, and store, and which should also produce results that met my needs. The design is quite simple: Attach a macro lens to your DSLR (or mirrorless) camera; attach the correct number of extension tubes to the lens; and attach the Easy 35 light source to the extension tubes. A film holder slots into the enclosed light source into which a strip of 35mm film is inserted. You can then frame the image in the camera, focus, take the shot, and then pull the film through to the next frame. The holder keeps the film flat and stray light and dust are kept to a minimum by the enclosed design. Vibration is also kept mostly in check by the system effectively being one with the scanning camera, although use of live view or an electronic shutter can help with vibrations caused by mirror slap (on a DSLR).

So I decided to purchase one, but first I would need to make another purchase – a DSLR!

Until a couple of years ago I still had my old Nikon D3200 DSLR but, as I’d not used it in years, I decided to sell it with the DX format lenses I owned. Had I had more foresight, I could have kept it and used it for scanning, saving myself some money in the process, but I didn’t. Spilled milk and all that.

So I had to buy a replacement.

After a bit of research I decided on a pre-owned Nikon D810. This is an older camera, dating from (I think) 2014, but it has a superb 36 megapixel sensor, would work with my macro lens (which I didn’t sell with the D3200 as it works perfectly well on my Nikon F80 film SLR), and as it’s a pro-level body, I can also use it for digital landscape photography (and taking nice pictures of my recently arrived granddaughter!). 36 megapixels is probably overkill for scanning 35mm film, but as Valoi also manufacture an Easy 120 system, I though it might future proof me should I decide on that route at some future point.

FILM - Beetle

After selling a bunch of stuff I no longer use or need on eBay I managed to earn enough to buy both the camera and the Valoi system without denting my savings, which was nice. I got a boxed D810 in great condition with less than 20k shutter actuations but, when I went to purchase the Easy 35 I saw that an updated version was available to pre-order. The version 2 has an improved lighting system and other features and is made from moulded parts, rather than being 3D printed. It was also available at a significant discount if pre-ordered, so I took the plunge on it. There were some slight delays in its manufacture and shipping, so I had to wait over two months for it to arrive, but it was delivered to me last week, meaning I could finally try it out.

The system includes the light source, 35mm film holder (other small format holders can be purchased separately for things like mounted slides, APS film, 110 film, plus a holder that allows film sprockets to be included), a set of machined metal extension tubes suitable for a range of macro lens focal lengths / different sensor sizes, a set of step-up rings to attach the tubes to your lens, a USB charging cable, and a simple (but just about good enough) instruction sheet.

FILM - Break time

Setting everything up took a few minutes and the light source already had charge, so I was able to scan a few test negatives pretty quickly. One of my concerns had been with regard to ease of focus – my dedicated 35mm scanners will resolve the grain without intervention – and I wasn’t sure how easy it would be to resolve the grain using the D810’s (non flip-up) rear LCD screen, but I needn’t have worried as it was remarkably easy to focus the lens manually to see the grain to pop into clear view when using the zoom on the LCD.

Scanning time is practically instant – as long as the shutter takes to fire – and then it’s just a case of drawing the film strip through the holder and photographing each frame. Even without practice I can easily scan a full roll of 36 cut negatives in under 10 minutes, which is a joy. No more sitting at the computer for hours while the scanner whirs and buzzes for minutes at a time!

FILM - Chillin' by the Cresta

The scans look good at the full 36 megapixels but I’m going to resize them down to the same size as I get with my Reflecta, which saves a lot of disk space without losing any noticeable detail (which is on a similar level to the Reflecta).

All-in-all I’m very happy with this new scanning setup. The quality is as good as best I’ve been able to achieve with a dedicated scanner, but with the benefit of no annoying banding issues and the very real advantage of super fast scanning times. If I decide to go back and scan older sheets of negs, I know that it’s a straightforward 10-minute job to do so rather than hours sat at the computer.

FILM - Model T

The pictures shared throughout this post are camera scans of a roll of Ilford Pan F which I shot nearly 10 years ago at a classic car show at Brodsworth Hall, but which I’ve only ever previously scanned with my old Epson V550. You can see full versions on Flickr by clicking the pictures. Top tip: If you edit the URL in flickr so that it has “/sizes” at the end of the URL, you can see the upload at a variety of resolutions, e.g., https://www.flickr.com/photos/fishyfish/35452430636/sizes/.

Here’s a comparison between scans from my DSLR setup and the original V550 versions zoomed to 100%. The V550 was scanned at 2400dpi. The DSLR scan has been resized to match the V550 scan resolution (the 36mp original is double the size otherwise). It’s a bit of an unfair comparison but I don’t have any of these shots scanned on both the Valoi,and with the Plustek or Reflecta’s.

DSLR scan on the left. Epson V550 scan on the right.

So what will come next? Well, based on my early impressions of the Valoi Easy 35 v2, I’m certainly drawn to the possibilities of the Easy 120 system. But that’s still the V1, so maybe I’ll wait and see if there’s a better version to come. My V850 will keep me going for now and, if I do upgrade in future, at least I know that re-scanning will be a quick process. 🙂

Nikon F70 & Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 AF-D on Ilford Pan F. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.

Taken on 20 June 2017

Here’s the Kyle McDougall video I mentioned up-post. He’s using the version 1, but the principle is the same.

35mm · Film photography · Photography

An upgrade to my scanning system – Part 1 the journey to date

My scanning journey has been an evolving beast over the past ten years of film shooting. My first scanner was a Canoscan LIDE which could only scan prints, not negatives, and it wasn’t long before I moved to a proper negative scanning solution in the form of an Epson V550 flatbed. The flatbed was ok for a starting point: not too expensive and the results were much better than from a scan of a lab print, but over time I became dissatisfied with the scans – there was a slight mushiness to them that I knew could be improved upon.

So I upgraded. The next machine was a Plustek 8100 35mm scanner. This didn’t have the ability to scan medium format (I still use a flatbed for that job for now, although using a V850 these days), but marked a noticeable improvement in scan quality over the V550. Gone was the mushiness, and a higher usable resolution of 3600dpi meant more detail could be drawn from my negatives. The Plustek required manual intervention, with each frame having to be pushed into the scanner in the film holder, but this wasn’t a problem and the scans were pretty quick.

It was at this point that I became dissatisfied with the colours I could achieve from home scanning and, for a while, I resorted to getting lab scans for colour film. This led to a parallel journey in conversion software as I attempted to find a solution that would give me the coulours I desired. Eventually I decided on Negative Lab Pro, which I’ve used ever since and which, the odd film stock or tricky frame aside, produces results I’m happy with.

The Plustek continued to serve me well until I began to notice a slight softness at one side of the scanned frames. This is very subtle, and perhaps most people would neither notice nor care, but once I saw it, it couldn’t be unseen, and (after unsuccessfully trying to resolve the issue) the itch to find another solution began.

Next came a Reflecta (Pacific Imaging to my friends across the Atlantic) – a Proscan 10T. This had a higher effective resolution over the Plustek – 4000dpi this time – plus a higher DMAX to garner some additional detail in the shadows. This scanner can produce really nice results but it’s not user friendly – on the surface it works similarly to the Plustek with a film holder that is slid into the scanner one frame at a time but, where the Plustek clicks nicely into place when the frame is properly positioned, the Reflecta 10T required you to look through a small window on the top of the device and position the frame by eye. After a while you get a feel for the correct positioning, but there are many times where you have to keep re-previewing the image to avoid cropping one edge or the other. The scanner (or mine, at least) is incredibly slow – sometimes taking over 10 minutes to scan a single frame! But there was another issue with my scanner… Banding.

On areas with low contrast areas – usually skies – faint but noticeable banding can be seen on the scan. It’s not an issue at all on busy scenes, where it is effectively camouflaged, or (for some reason I’ve not worked out) colour scans, where the banding doesn’t seem to occur at all. But I shoot a lot of black and white film, and a lot of those feature the sky, so the dissatisfaction resurfaced once more.

So the search for something better began again. The only real options available to me were a used small professional scanner such as a Nikon Coolscan model, or the world of DSLR scanning solutions. The Nikons get very good word of mouth, but the better models are expensive and are all at least twenty years old, meaning there’s always the risk of them conking out or needing specialist maintenance or repair so, while it wasn’t off the cards, I felt DSLR scanning might be a better choice and is the route I’ve taken.

I’ll reveal my setup tomorrow..

As I always post a picture in these posts, here’s an old image I’ve re-scanned with the new setup. It’s perhaps not the most exciting image, but it’s the sort of thing I’m glad to have photographed as this scene no longer exists, this street having been re-developed over the past few years (the picture is nearly 10 years old). You can see how it looks today (or on the last occasion the Google Maps car drove past) here.

FILM - Herbert Brown

Olympus 35 RC & Agfa Vista Plus 200. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.

Taken on 13 September 2016

35mm · Film photography · Photography

Bazaar

Another concise post, I’m afraid. I will be posting something with a little more substance shortly though as I have a new scanning setup about which I’ll provide some initial thoughts.

TJ's Bazaar

Minolta X-300, Minolta MD 50mm f/1.7 & Kodak Gold. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.

Taken on 14 March 2026

35mm · Film photography · Photography

Failure to launch

I went out today to shoot some large format film, the first time in over a year. I took four holders with me, two loaded with HP5+, the others with Ektar.

I decided to take a trip into the Peak District, to Stanton Moor, where there are a number of interesting features, including rock outcrops, stone circles, and ruined industrial buildings amongst others. It’s roughly 45 minutes drive from home and I left at 6:15am in order to ensure the sun was still quite low in the sky.

Shooting 4×5 in rarely a speedy process (for me at least) so, given the locations for my pictures were a fair distance apart, each shot necessitated setting everything up – tripod, camera out of the bag, camera set-up, lens attaching, framing the composition and setting any movements required before firing the shutter. Then packing it all away again before moving on to find the next shot.

I shot all four sheets of HP5+, and tow sheets of Ektar. I’ve probably knackered one of these because I forgot to change the ISO on my light meter, so it’s effectively underexposed by two stops. Oh well.

Anyway, I got home around lunchtime and decided I’d develop the HP5+. Imagine my delight when I discovered that both film holders contained no film…

I was certain that they were loaded as I’ve been meaning to shoot them for ages, concerned that they have been sat in a cupboard for months, but it seems my memory doth deceiveth me.

I’ll have to check the Ektar to make sure those aren’t the same (although I’m still pretty confident that they’re loaded).

Thankfully, I took my Olympus XA-3 with me and shot about 20 frames with that, so the day shouldn’t be a complete failure. I also developed a roll of 120 HP5+ I shot last weekend (given I’d gotten all the gear out), and those look quite nice. I also still got to visit Stanton Moor and note that it’s place worth visiting again in future, so as a scouting trip, it was a success at least.

I’m a bit gutted though, all the same.

Anyway, here’s another shot from my Scarborough trip (although even that day had it’s problems, as I described here).

It’s a rusty railing next to the beach, but it also looks a little like a bendy-armed figure about to give a hug, which I perhaps need today.

Rusted railing

Minolta X-300, Minolta MD 50mm f/1.7 & Kodak Gold. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.

Taken on 14 March 2026