I was going to move onto a different set of photos from today but I’ve had a strange day where I’ve been feeling tired, listless, and unable to focus on stuff, which is not a particularly nice sensation. So I’ll hopefully find time to post something more meaningful tomorrow.
But here are the last couple of pictures I’ll post from the Bridlington trip.
It’s turned very warm and humid here over the past 24 hours and I’m not in a mind to write much for the blog today (and I have a videogame that has my attention calling out for me to play! 🙂 ).
This single track railway line heads north from Bridlington, passing through Bempton, Hunmanby and Filey, before joining the line to Scarborough at Seamer. I have a fond memory of Seamer despite never having stepperd foot in the place. When I was young we would visit my godmother (who was one of my mum’s childhood friends) who owned a Bed & Breakfast at Filey, and stay there for a summer holiday. I can’t remember how many times we did this, but at least a couple of times, and maybe more.
I haven’t heard anything of my godmother for a very long time, or her three daughters, but seeing Seamer on a map or signpost reminds me of these holidays as it’s where the train would split off the Scarborough line to Filey.
There’s a hint of Stephen King’s story, The Body (made into the movie Stand By Me) about this picture, I think.
I didn’t give a lot of thought to this vessel when I photographed it – I just thought it might make for an interesting picture. However, a quick search on the internet turned up some interesting information.
The ship here, the dredger Gypsey Race, was built in 2017 and is currently under the auspices of Bridlington Harbour Commission. The name most likely derives from a chalk stream of the same name which enters the sea in Bridlington harbour. It’s a winterbourne stream, meaning it remains dry during the summer months. One of the villages through which it runs, Boynton, has an annual rubber duck race where hundreds of plastic waterfowl are launched into the water to raise money for the local village hall. The word Gypsey in the name of the stream apparently denotes a watercourse that spends parts of its course beneath ground.
The current Gypsey Race is not the first of it’s name though, and an earlier vessel existed. This one was built in 1940 for Southend-on-Sea County Borough and went under the name Prittlewell and was likely used to keep the channels around the Thames forts clear during World War II. She was later renamed the Essex Queen in 1971 and then acquired by Bridlington Harbour Commision in 1977 where she was renamed as Gypsey Race and modernised. From the mid 80s she was used for dredging Bridlington Harbour and other locations along the east coast. She was broken up in 2010.
Last week, when I had a few days off work, I decided to go and shoot some more sheets of film with my large format camera. It’s been over six months now since I first got a 4×5 camera, and in that time I’ve bought two of them. This wasn’t my original intent but, due to problems with the first camera that I was unable to resolve I was left with two options. The first, give up on large format, wasn’t really an option as I’d invested in all the associated kit that goes with the format (plus I didn’t want to give up on it). The second option was to bite the bullet and buy a replacement camera and, thanks to finding a used Chamonix model at a good price, this was the route I took. There was actually a third option too – to borrow a camera from someone, and this is what I’d set out to do before I found the Chamonix. In fact I’ve still been loaned another camera and a couple of lenses, meaning that I’ll soon have shot three large format cameras in this relatively short period of time!
However, shooting large format is not something that can be done on a whim. While 35mm and even medium format cameras can generally be picked up and taken out to make some pictures quickly and easily, large format demands much more of my time, both in terms of setting the equipment up to make a picture, and also in preparing for an outing in the form of loading film into holders using a changing bag. No grabbing a roll of film and quickly dropping it into the back of the camera with this format!
What this has meant is that I haven’t really been out with a large format camera all that many times and so I’m not well practiced in using the gear. I know what I’m doing, but I’m not very good at it yet, which means I tend to make mistakes every time I do have a session. Not major mistakes usually, but enough to reduce the quality of my work to some extent. Still, practice makes perfect, so I try to get out and use the large format when a suitable opportunity presents itself.
I had hoped that last week would be such an opportunity as the weather had looked promising, but it turned out to be less optimal than I’d hoped in the end. I decided to visit Magpie Mine in the Peak District, a place I’ve photographed before, and which I thought might be promising for some 4×5 photographs. The day had a cloudy sky, albeit one with plenty of texture and relatively frequent gaps where the sunshine would break through. With smaller formats it’s relatively easy to take advantage of the good light when it fleetingly appears. Not so much with large format as, by the time you’ve set everything up, the light has changed again. This was made even more difficult by a brisk wind that was present. While the camera wasn’t being blown about too much (although I did lose one shot due to camera shake), the darkcloth that I use to be able to see the ground glass on the rear of the camera was whipping around like a dervish and making it very difficult to check composition and focus.
While there was the occasion splash of nice light, I didn’t have the skill (or patience to wait!) to make use of it, so the shots I took at the location are a little flat. I’d planned on shooting more images while there, but the conditions (well, the wind) meant I decided to head off to somewhere in a more sheltered position.
Of the three shots posted here today, the first is probably the best executed. The focus is good across the piece and, while the lighting could be better, the subject isn’t harmed by it too much. The second picture is my facourite in terms of composition, but I wish I’d closed the aperture another stop as the distant buildings aver a teeny bit soft (although the wall in the forground and the building at middle distance are both fine). The final picture of the lone chimney, was a bit of an experiment. I wondered how it might look shot wide open at f/5.6. However all this has done really is soften the foreground grass, add a noticeable vignette and, because there was probably a bit of tilt on the front standard that I neglected to check properly due to my frustration with the wind, has thrown the top of the chimney out of focus too. Still, as I’ve already said, practice makes perfect, and every time I use the camera it’s a learning experience!
A selection of boats seen in Bridlington harbour. Most of the images were shot with with my Zuiko 75-150mm zoom and I notice a definite difference in quality when compared with the Zuiko 35mm f/2.8 lens I also used the same day. They’re not awful by any means, and it’s perhaps not fair to compare a telephoto zoom with a prime lens for visual fidelity, but there is a difference nonetheless.
I photographed this same scene last summer on a much nicer day, that time using my Yashicamat 124G and some Fuji Pro 400H. This version is shot on Ilford FP4+ with my Chamonix 045N-1 large format camera. This one has much more resolution, but the earlier colour pictures look nicer I think.
I’ve been tearing my hair out (not that I have much) for the last couple of days trying to scan some Kodak Ektar which, for some reason, doesn’t look right despite me scanning it the same way as ever. I’ve now resorted to re-scanning some older Ektar negs that I know worked fine before to see it it’s just this new roll with a problem – and it appears it is.
In a way this is a relief as at least I know there’s not some issue with my scanner or my scanning configuration, but it does mean that something has gone awry somewhere else. My first thought is that I might have underexposed the film somehow – I did shoot a roll of 400asa film before this one, so it’s possible that I failed to change the ISO setting on the light meter before shifting to the 100asa Ektar, but I’m not sure if there’s two stops of difference to be seen. I’ll have to investigate further I guess…
Anyway, here’s a picture that has nothing to do with any of that stuff whatsoever.
A trio of photos of people enjoying the beach at Bridlington. There’s something intrinsically British about people reading a newspaper while sat on a chair on the sand. I’m only surprised they’re not wearing overcoats and hats!
I’m not sure if the people in this next picture wrote the words in the sand, or just sat there because they thought it was the best place to get some of Jesus’ love.
Windbreaks, umbrellas and tents. Everything you need for a day at the British seaside…
I do love the Brisish seaside, despite my tongue-in-cheek ribbing. 🙂
I guess the title of today’s post fits a couple of things that I’ve done in the past two days with regards to the large format photography I mentioned in yesterday’s post.
The first is the exposure of the picture below – and I mean the exposure – because it was certainly based upon little more than guesswork and crossed fingers. That’s not to say that I didn’t make some effort to meter the scene as best I could, but it was a mixture of bright highlights and dark shadows and all I had was my Sekonic L-308 incident meter and the light meter app on my phone. Ideally I would have had a spot meter to correctly assess the scene and put everything into the correct “zones”. But I don’t own a spot meter, and have nought but a basic understanding of the zone system in any case.
So instead I used a couple of methods to try and guage the exposure. The light meter app on the phone was used to see what it gave me for the whole scene, and then for the brightest and darkest areas. It’s not a precise as a 1° meter, but it gave me some readings. I then repeated the process with the L-308 in it’s reflective mode. The readings from both were in the same ballpark roughly, but not really precise, and I was getting exposure settings at between 8 seconds and 1/30th of a second at f/22. In the end IU decided to chance it on a 2 second exposure. Again, some degree of winging it was required as the longest exposure on my large format lens is 1 second, so I had to use bulb and “Mississippi” it.
The other area of wingmanship to take place was with regards the development. Because one of the unit sizes for 4×5 film is 25 sheets, and because my developing tank takes four sheets at a time, there will come a time where I have a stray sheet of film left from a box. On this outing I had three. All different stocks! I could develop then individuality, but I find developing film something of a chore at the best of times, so I wanted to see if I could combine all three sheets (Ilford HP5+, Ilford FP4+, and Fomapan 100) in one session.
My first though was to use stand development – something I’ve not tried before – but then I discovered that, if I pushed the Foampan 100 by a stop, it would take 9 minutes in an Ilfotex DD-X 1+4 solution – the same as HP5+! The FP4+ was trickier as it takes 10 minutes in the same developer at it’s 125asa box speed. So I decided to pull it slightly and meter it at 100asa – barely any difference really, but hopefully enough to compensate for the shorter development.
So today I developed all three sheets for 9 minutes in DD-X. And they all look fine.
The church interior shot did need some additional work in Photoshop. Although there was plenty of dynamic range captured, the scan would either feature blown highlights in the window, of very deep shadows (or a halfway house that looked a bit muddy). So, in the end I made two scans, one exposing for the window, the other for the interior, and then merged the two to allow me to get a better overall exposure. It’s still a bit noisy in the shadows, but I can live with that (although I did notice that Epson Scan seems to have been delivering JPEGs rather than TIFF files recently, so I must hace altered a setting at some point. I’ll make sure my next scans are set back to TIFFs and not whether that improves shadow noise.
I’ll post the other two shots from the multi-development session when I’ve uploaded them to Flickr, but in the meantime here is the church interior photograph – taken inside Holy Trinity Church, Ashford in the Water.