I haven’t been able to bring myself to start (re)dust-spotting the image I spoke about yesterday yet, but I have completed my re-scans of my 2018 Sorrento negatives. I don’t think the final roll had as many interesting pictures, sadly, but there are a few good ones – although most of them have already been uploaded to my Flickr account previously, so it will just be a case of replacing them with (hopefully) better versions.
But today it’s another picture from Scarborough. I have a love/hate relationship with Kodak Gold. It can produce very nice results, but I always find it a pain to scan, sometime giving me differing results across a single roll. For instance, the picture today has some odd graininess at the upper right of the frame, which I’ve reduced a little, but not completely. Similar artifacts are not present on other shots, so who knows the cause?
Minolta X-300, Minolta MD 50mm f/1.7 & Kodak Gold. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.
I’m in an odd mood today and feel very little impetus to do anything with my pictures. I think this is in large part due to the fact that a scan I spent ages dust spotting a few days ago has been lost and I now only have the original with all the dust, and I really don’t have the energy to go through that process again right now. This has dampened my mood and put me off doing anything else.
It’s frustrating when lab negs have far more dust than the ones I develop at home and dry in the shower cubicle!
Minolta X-300, Minolta MD 50mm f/1.7 & Kodak Gold. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.
After many weeks of mostly overcast and rainy weather, I finally got a nice day yesterday where I had the opportunity to go out for a day of photography.
I decided to visit Scarborough, mostly because I’ve recently been looking at Paddy Summerfield’s The Holiday Pictures book and it gave me the urge and inspiration to go an make pictures at the coast.
Scarborough is appoximately 2-hours by car, so not too far, but not somewhere I can pop along to whenever I feel like it, so it was a bit of a mini event. Although it was overcast most of the way there, as I got closer the skies began to open up and I was rewarded with a lovely morning when I arrived.
I had a couple of cameras with me: my Minolta X-300 containing dome Kodak Gold, and my Nikon F80, which I’d loaded with Ilford Type 517 film I had a roll in the camera, plus a spare, and also a roll of expired Tri-X should I get through all the rest.
I spent a happy morning taking pictures in the great light and covered several miles, walking form the cliffs of the south bay, all the way to the north bay and back again, stopping only for a bottle of water and, on the way back, to treat myself to well-earned fish and chips. I finished the Kodak Gold, and both rolls of the Type 517. By midday the clouds had rolled back in and the best of the light was gone, so I headed back home.
Today I had the opportunity to develop the film after my dad visited, so I got stuck in, looking forward to the pictures. I’ve shot Type 517 previously and was very pleased by the way it looked, and was hopeful for similarly nice results. It was not to be…
As soon as I took the films from the reels I was very disappointed to see significant light-leaks on many of the frames. The first roll less affected, but the second with dark stripes on almost every negative, in the same place on each frame and covering the image and the rebate. I wracked my brain to try and think what might have gone amiss, especially as both rolls were affected.
Because the F80 takes the film all the way back into the cassette, I have to use a film retriever to pull it back out to get it onto the developing reels, and it seemed a little more difficult than usual to insert the tongue of the retriever into the light traps on both cassettes, and my first thought was that I’d somehow introduced light in the process (although it’s never happened before). My other (worse) thought, was that the camera had developed a fault which might be more costly to resolve.
However, it seems that neither of those is the cause. While searching online I found this post where someone had had almost identical problems, albeit when shooting some bulk-rolled film. The light leaks in the pictures they shared are almost exactly the same as what I had experienced:
Thankfully, the post also responds with the identified cause, namely that the labels on their bulk rolls were semi-translucent and, because the camera they’d used has a small window in the back to see what film was loaded, light had piped around the label, into the camera, and onto the film.
I suspect that this is what has happened with my type 517 rolls. While I can’t say for certain that the labels are conducting light through my F80s rear film window, it seems likely given the similarities. I also note that the Type 517 cassettes are reflective metal, which might also lead to the problem. The last time I shot it, without any problems, I used my aforementioned Minolta X-300, which has no film window.
The Type 517 cassette, with glossy label on a shiny metal container
I’m hopeful that this has gotten to the bottom of things and that I can shoot the film (and my F80) with confidence in future, either by only shooting it with suitable cameras, or by taping over the F80’s film window. It’s still been a painful experiece though – there are a lot of nice pictures that have been ruined (although I’m hoping I might be able to save some of them by way of some artistic cropping…), plus it was a long way to got to have spoiled pictures.
I do still have the roll of Kodak Gold to get developed though, and I’m going to give the F80 a test run with some bulk-rolled Fomapan just to put my mind at ease before shooting it again on anything that involves a lengthy journey! These things happen, and there’s not a lot I can do about it other than try to avoid a repeat occurrence.
I’ll share pictures from the day when I have them developed, but more stuff to come before then. In the meantime, here’s an older picture I took in Scarborough a few years ago.
I thought I’d drop in a whole bunch of pictures today, all taken while in Scarborough a few weeks ago. Scarborough rose to prominence as a spa town where it’s popularity led to visitors from London and other parts of the country making use of its facilities. The actual discovery of the spa waters took place in the 17th century, but the resort bloomed with the coming of the railways in the mid 19th century.
The town spans a north and south bay, seperated by a headland atop which stands the ruins of a medieval castle. The south bay is the more commecrcial of the two and is where the majority of the tourist facilities lie, while the north bay is quieter (although still with plenty of attractions, including Peasholm Park where mock naval battles are carried out on the boating lake). All the photos here were taken in and around the south bay.
Our visit took place on the first day of a three day trip to the region when we stayed near Whitby a little further up the coast.
Olympus Trip 35 & Kodak Colorplus. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.
I guess even Doctor Who enjoys a day out at the coast every now and then. This police call box in Scarborough is grade II listed and still sits in (or at least very close to) its original location.
Olympus Trip 35 & Kodak Colorplus. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.
This joke shop in Scarborough has been there for a long time, since 1996 in fact. I only discovered this today and it came as a bit of a surprise as, if I’d been pressed, I’d have said it had been there for much longer. I was certain that it was there when I used to visit the town on coach trips back in the 1970s and 80s, but apparently not. Maybe there was another joke shop there (or close by) before that, or perhaps I’d just gotten my memories in a twist soewhere along the way.
The yellow and red of the shop frontage have popped nicely on the Colorplus film, despite the day being somewhat dull and overcast. It’s certainly fared better than the Portra 800 I shot under similar conditions (of which you will see some results in the coming week or so).
Olympus Trip 35 & Kodak Colorplus. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.
This is where my wife and I got some lunch when we visited Scarborough at the end of July. We’ve always used another chippy on past visits – the Lifeboat Chippy – further down this road at the bottom of the hill as they do very nice fish and chips, but as we were already halfway up the hill when lunchtime arrived, and as we were walking in the opposite direction to the other shop, we decided to give this one a go. We didn’t have any chips as we’d had breakfast sandwiches earlier at the start of the journey and were still feeling a little full, so both of us opted for fish only. The fish was pretty good and I managed to eat it without being attacked by gulls!
Olympus Trip 35 & Kodak Colorplus. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.
Yesterday’s photo had the Grand Hotel in the background and here it is again, albeit much closer this time, providing the brick backdrop to the funicular station.
The funicular railway here was built almost 15 years after the hotel, opening to passengers in 1881, and it still serves residents and visitors to this day. There were originally a total of five funicular railways at the resort, but there are only two still in service today: the one here (the Central Tramway), and another on the south cliffs (aptly named the South Cliff Lift). Another between these two (the Saint Nicholas Cliff Lift, just the other side of the Grand Hotel) is still in place, but the bottom station is now an ice-cream parlour while the two carriages are fixed in place at the top of the incline and make up the Saint Nicholas Cafe.
The other two were in the North Bay area of the town. The North Bay Cliff Lift was closed in 1996 and has been dismantled and placed in storage, while the Queen’s Parade Cliff Lift appears to have had a somewhat ill-fated lifespan, being subject to runaway cars, accidents and mechanical failures until a landslide eventually caused it to close for good in 1887, just nine years after it opened.
There are various meandering pathways to and from the seafront for those who don’t wish to ride in style (or some seriously imposing sets of steps for those of a sturdy disposition!).