Another concise post, I’m afraid. I will be posting something with a little more substance shortly though as I have a new scanning setup about which I’ll provide some initial thoughts.
Minolta X-300, Minolta MD 50mm f/1.7 & Kodak Gold. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.
Apologies for the short posts of late. I’ve either been very busy or, as has been the case the past few days, trapped in the heatwave that’s affecting big chunks of Western Europe at present.
Minolta X-300, Minolta MD 50mm f/1.7 & Kodak Gold. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.
I went out today to shoot some large format film, the first time in over a year. I took four holders with me, two loaded with HP5+, the others with Ektar.
I decided to take a trip into the Peak District, to Stanton Moor, where there are a number of interesting features, including rock outcrops, stone circles, and ruined industrial buildings amongst others. It’s roughly 45 minutes drive from home and I left at 6:15am in order to ensure the sun was still quite low in the sky.
Shooting 4×5 in rarely a speedy process (for me at least) so, given the locations for my pictures were a fair distance apart, each shot necessitated setting everything up – tripod, camera out of the bag, camera set-up, lens attaching, framing the composition and setting any movements required before firing the shutter. Then packing it all away again before moving on to find the next shot.
I shot all four sheets of HP5+, and tow sheets of Ektar. I’ve probably knackered one of these because I forgot to change the ISO on my light meter, so it’s effectively underexposed by two stops. Oh well.
Anyway, I got home around lunchtime and decided I’d develop the HP5+. Imagine my delight when I discovered that both film holders contained no film…
I was certain that they were loaded as I’ve been meaning to shoot them for ages, concerned that they have been sat in a cupboard for months, but it seems my memory doth deceiveth me.
I’ll have to check the Ektar to make sure those aren’t the same (although I’m still pretty confident that they’re loaded).
Thankfully, I took my Olympus XA-3 with me and shot about 20 frames with that, so the day shouldn’t be a complete failure. I also developed a roll of 120 HP5+ I shot last weekend (given I’d gotten all the gear out), and those look quite nice. I also still got to visit Stanton Moor and note that it’s place worth visiting again in future, so as a scouting trip, it was a success at least.
I’m a bit gutted though, all the same.
Anyway, here’s another shot from my Scarborough trip (although even that day had it’s problems, as I described here).
It’s a rusty railing next to the beach, but it also looks a little like a bendy-armed figure about to give a hug, which I perhaps need today.
Minolta X-300, Minolta MD 50mm f/1.7 & Kodak Gold. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.
I haven’t been able to bring myself to start (re)dust-spotting the image I spoke about yesterday yet, but I have completed my re-scans of my 2018 Sorrento negatives. I don’t think the final roll had as many interesting pictures, sadly, but there are a few good ones – although most of them have already been uploaded to my Flickr account previously, so it will just be a case of replacing them with (hopefully) better versions.
But today it’s another picture from Scarborough. I have a love/hate relationship with Kodak Gold. It can produce very nice results, but I always find it a pain to scan, sometime giving me differing results across a single roll. For instance, the picture today has some odd graininess at the upper right of the frame, which I’ve reduced a little, but not completely. Similar artifacts are not present on other shots, so who knows the cause?
Minolta X-300, Minolta MD 50mm f/1.7 & Kodak Gold. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.
I’m in an odd mood today and feel very little impetus to do anything with my pictures. I think this is in large part due to the fact that a scan I spent ages dust spotting a few days ago has been lost and I now only have the original with all the dust, and I really don’t have the energy to go through that process again right now. This has dampened my mood and put me off doing anything else.
It’s frustrating when lab negs have far more dust than the ones I develop at home and dry in the shower cubicle!
Minolta X-300, Minolta MD 50mm f/1.7 & Kodak Gold. Lab developed. Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro.